Alternative Schools Network. (1994, July 8). Small schools for Chicago. Statements of 13 Chicago-based organizations. Unpublished manuscript. Chicago, IL.

American Legislative Exchange Council. (1994). The Report Card on American Education.

Ancess, J. (1998). Urban dreamcatchers: Planning and launching new small schools. In M. Fine & J. I. Somerville (Eds.), Small schools, big imaginations: A creative look at urban public schools (pp. 22-35). Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.

Anderson, V. (1992, April 22) Smaller Is Better. Catalyst Special Series, 6, 1-7.

Anderson, V. (1998, May). Smaller is better, school reform, what matters most. Catalyst: Voices of Chicago School Reform.

Aschbacker, P. R. (1991). Effects of restructuring on disadvantaged students: Humanitas—a case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Ashton-Warner, S. (1963). Teacher. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Ayers, W. (1993). To teach: The journey of a teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.

Azcoitia, C. (1995, June 22). Report and recommendations on small schools in Chicago. Chicago, IL: The Small Schools Task

Bachus, G. (1992). School-based management: Do teachers want more involvement in decision making? Rural Educator, 4 (1), p.4.

Baker, R. and Gump, P. 1964. Big school, small school. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.

Barker, R., & Gump, P. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Beckner, W. (1983). The case for the smaller school. Bloomington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. ED 228 002.

Bensman, D. (1964). Lives of the graduates of Central Park East Elementary School: Where have they gone? What did they really learn? New York: NCREST.

Berger, J. (1992, August 6). Plan seeks small schools with themes. The New York Times, pp.B1, B5.

Bryk, A., Holland, P. & Lee, V. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 75-78.

Bryk, A.S., & Thum, Y.M. (1989). The effects of high school organization on dropping out: An exploratory investigation. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 353-383.

Bryk, A.S., Easton, J.Q., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S.G., & Sebring, P.A. (1993). A view from the elementary schools: The state of reform in Chicago. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. p.19.

Bryk, A.S., Easton, J.Q., Sebring, P.A., Luppescu, S., Yeow, M.T., Lopez, W.A., Smith, B. (August, 1995). Charting reform: Chicago teachers take stock. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Bryk, A.S., Lee, V.E., & Smith, J.B. (1990). High school organization and its effects on teachers and students: An interpretive summary of the research. In W.H. Clune & J.F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American Education, Vol. 1 (pp. 135-226). New York: Falmer Press.

California Department of Education. (1990). Enhancing opportunities for higher education among underrepresented students. Sacramento, CA: Author.

Carnegie Corporation of New York. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. The report of the task force on education of young adolescents. New York: Author. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 322).

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. An imperiled generation: Saving urban schools. New York City.

Carnes, M. C. (1996). The big high school that wasn't built. Education Week, 16(1), 48, 51.

Carnochan, S. (1997). Review of research on school district size. University of California, Los Angeles.

Conant, J.B. (1959). The American high school today: A first report to interested citizens. (1st. ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

Conant, J.B. (1967) The comprehensive high school. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Consortium on Chicago School Research (1992). Report No. 1on a survey of CPS elementary school teachers. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.

Corcoran, T. B. (1989). Restructuring education: A new vision at Hope Essential High School. In J.M. Rosow, & R. Zager (Eds.), Allies in educational reform (pp. 243-274). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cotton, K. (1996). Affective and social benefits of small-scale schooling. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 410 088)

Cotton, K. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance. Close-up, 2. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 476)

Crain, R. L., Heebner, A. L., & Si, Y. (1992). The effectiveness of New York City career magnet schools: An evaluation of ninth grade performance using an experimental design. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.

Crain, R.L. & Strauss, J.K. (1986). Are smaller high schools more or less effective? Baltimore: Center for Organization of School, Johns Hopkins University.

Cusick, P., Martin, W. & Palonsky, S. (1978). Organizational structure and student behavior in secondary school. Studies in educational administration and organization, 7,8, 106-118.

Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action: Studies of schools and students at work. The series on school reform. New York: Teachers College Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., McGregor, K., & Zuckerman, D. (1995). The coalition campus schools project: Inching toward systemic change in New York City. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools, and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Dillon, S. (1995a, May 22). A school called Vanguard that learned the hard way. The New York Times, p.B5.

Dunn, F. (1977). Choosing smallness. In J. Sher (Ed.) Education in rural America: A reassessment of conventional wisdom. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Edmonds, R. (1986). Characteristics of effective schools. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp. 93-104). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

English, F.W. (1993). Changing the cosmology of the school schedule. In L.W. Anderson & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Timepiece: Extending and enhancing learning time. (pp.23-29). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Fetler, M. (1989). School dropout rates, academic performance, size, and poverty: Correlates of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 109-116..

Fine, M., & Somerville, J. I., (Eds.). (1998). Small schools, big imaginations: A creative look at urban public schools. Chicago: Cross City Campaign for Urban School Reform.

Fine, M. Ed. Chartering Urban School Reform: Reflections on Public High Schools in the Midst of Change. New York, Teachers College Press, 1994.

Fouts, J. T. (1994). A school within a school: Evaluation results of the first year of a restructuring effort. Seattle: School of Education, Seattle Pacific University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 195)

Fowler, W. J., Jr. (1995). School size and student outcomes. In H. J. Walberg (Series Ed.) & B. Levin, W. J. Fowler, Jr., and H. J. Walberg (Vol. Eds.), Advances in education productivity: Vol. 5. Organizational influences on productivity (pp. 3-25). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.

Fowler, W., Jr. & W. H.J. (1991). School size, characteristics and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13 (2).

Fowler, W.A. (1992). What do we know about school size? What should we know? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Fowler, W.A. (1994). School size and student outcomes. Unpublished manuscript. p. 29.

Fowler, W.J. & Herbert J. 1991, Summer). School size, characteristics and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, pp. 189-202.

Fried, Robby, Ed. (1982). Effective schooling in a rural context: A New Hampshire view. Northeast Regional Exchange, Chelmsford, MA. ED 243 628.

Garbarino, J. (1978). The human ecology of school crime: A case for small schools. In E. Wenk & N. Harlow (Eds.), School crime and disruption: Prevention models. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

Garbarino, J. (1980). Some thoughts on school size and its effects on adolescent development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 9 (1), 19-31.

Glass, Gene, Ed. School class size: Research and policy. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1982. ED 217 111.

Gordon, R. (1992). School within a school: Grades 7, 8, 9, 10. Focus on program evaluation. Des Moines, IA: Des Moines Pubic Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 371 045)

Grant, G. (1994, August). Schools where kids are known. Network News & Views.

Graves, T. (1990, March). Non-academic benefits of cooperative learning. Cooperative Learning, 10 (3), 16-17.

Green, G., & Stevens, W. (1988). What research says about small schools. Rural Educator, 10 (1), 9-14.

Greenleaf C.L. (1995, April). You feel like you belong: Student perspectives on becoming a community of learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Guthrie, J. W. (1979). Organizational scale and school success. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, pp. 17-27.

Haller, E. J. (1992). High school size and student indiscipline: Another aspect of the school consolidation issue? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(2), 145-56

Haller, E. J. Monk, D. H., Bear, A. S., Griffith, J., & Moss, P. (1990). School size and program comprehensiveness: Evidence from high school and beyond. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12 (2), 109-120

Haller, E., Monk, D., & Tien, L. (1993). Small schools and higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 9(2), 66-73.

Hancock, L. (1994, October 24). In Defiance of Darwin: How a public school in the Bronx turns drop outs into scholars. Newsweek, p. 61.

Harrington, D. & Cookson, P.W. Jr. (1992). School reform in East Harlem: Alternative schools vs. "Schools of Choice." In G.Alfred Hess, (Ed.), Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists. pp. 177-186.

Heinbuch, S.E. & Wagner, F. (1992). Small schools operating costs: Reversing assumptions about economies of scale. New York, NY: Public Education Association.

Heller, E.J., Monk, D.H., Bear, A.S., Griffith, J. & Moss, P. (1990). School size and program comprehensiveness: Evidence from High school and beyond. Educational evaluation and policy analysis 12, (2), 109-120.

Hess, G.A. & Corsino, L. (1988, March). Examining the Effects of Inter-District Variation of School Size and Resources. Paper presented by the Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Hill, P. (1990). High schools with character, vii. Rand Corporation study.

Hodgson, J.H. (1958). The schools within a school plan. Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, New York, NY.

Howley, C. (in press). Compounding disadvantage: Consolidation and the effects of school and district size on student achievement in West Virginia. Journal of Research in Rural Education.

Howley, C. B. (1989). Synthesis of the effects of school and district size: What research says about achievement in small schools and school districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4(1), 2-12.

Howley, C. B. (1994). The academic effectiveness of small scale schooling (an update). ERIC Digest. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 389 503)

Howley, C. B., & Bickel, R. (2000). Results of a four-state study: Smaller schools reduce harmful impact of poverty on student achievement. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust.

Howley, C.B. (1989, Fall). Synthesis of the effects of school and district size: What research says about achievement in small schools and school districts. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, pp. 2-12.

James, M.G. (1992, April). I came. I saw. I was conquered. BPI Newsletter.

James, M.G. (1992, Fall). Field of Dreams. BPI Newsletter.

Jewell, R. S. (1989). School and school district size relationships: Costs, results, minorities, and private school enrollments. Education and Urban Society, 21(2), 140-153.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1990). Learning together and alone. New York: Prentice Hall.

Jokiel, B. J., & Starkey, J. (1972). Effect of a school within a school program on attitudes of underachieving students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 076 592)

Kirp, D. L. (1992, November). What school choice really means. The Atlantic Monthly.

Klonsky, M. & Ford, P. (1994, May). One urban solution: Small schools. Educational Leadership, pp. 64-66.

Klonsky, M. (1995, June). Yet another board in wings as unions take big hit. Catalyst, 6 (9), 33.

Klonsky, M. (1995b). Challenges of high school restructuring: The view from Philadelphia. Unpublished manuscript. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois-Chicago.

Klonsky, M. (Forthcoming). The small schools revolution: Restructuring Chicago's schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Lamdin, D. H. (1995). Testing for the effects of school size on student achievement within a school district. Education Economics, 3(1), 33-42.

Larson, R.L. (1991, March). Small is Beautiful: Innovation from the Inside Out. Phi Delta Kappan, pp. 550-554.

Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241-70.

Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1996). High school size: Which works best, and for whom? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1995). Understanding high school restructuring effects on the equitable distribution of learning mathematics and science. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Lee, V.E. & Smith, J.B. (1994, Fall). High school restructuring and student achievement: A new study finds strong links. Issues in restructuring schools: Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Issue report #7.

Lee, V.E., & Smith, J.B. (Fall 1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, (3), 205-227.

Lee, V.E., & Smith, J.B. (October, 1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68, (4), 241-270.

Lee, V.E., and Smith, J.B. High School Size: Which Works Best, and for Whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205-227).

Lee, V.E., Dederick, R.F. & Smith, J.B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teacher satisfaction. Sociology of Education. 64, (3): pp. 190-208.

Lindsay, P. (1982). The effect of high school size on student participation, satisfaction and attendance." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 4, pp. 57-65

Lindsay, P. (1984). High school size, participation in activities, and young adult social participation: Some enduring effects of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 6, 73-83.

Lindsay, P. (1984, Spring). High school size, population, activities, and young adult social participation: Some enduring effects of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 6,(1), 73-83.

Little, J.W. (1995). Subject affiliation in high schools that restructure. In L.S. Siskin & J.W. Little (Eds.), The subjects in question: Departmental organization and the high school (pp.172-200). New York, NY: Teachers College

Luyten, H. 1994. School size effects on achievement in secondary education: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the USA. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(1), 75-99.

Maeroff, G.I. (1992). To improve schools, reduce their size. College Board News, 20 (3), 3.

McCabe, J. G., & Oxley, D. (1989). Making big high schools smaller: A review of the implementation of the house plan in New York City's most troubled high schools. New York: Public Education Association; Bank Street College of Education.

McCabe, J.G., & Oxley, D. (1989). Making big high schools smaller: A review of the implementation of the house plan in New York City's most troubled high schools. New York, NY: Public Education Association & Bank Street College of Education.

McClintock, R., de Zengotita, T., Chou, L., & Moretti, F. Risk and Renewal: First Annual Report, 1991-1992. New York: New Laboratory for Teaching and Learning.

McMullan, B. J., Sipe, C. L., & Wolfe, W. C. (1994). Charter and student achievement: Early evidence from school restructuring in Philadelphia. Philadelphia: Center for Assessment and Policy Development.

McMullan, B.J., Sipe, C.L. & Wolf, W.C. (1994). Charters and student achievement: Early evidence from school restructuring in Philadelphia. Center for Assessment and Policy Development.

McPartland, J.M., Jordan, W., Legters, N., and Balfanz, R. (1997, October). Finding safety in small numbers. Educational Leadership, 55,14-17.

Meier, D. (1993, Fall). A talk on small schools. BPI Newsletter.

Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.

Meier, D. (1995, January). How our small schools could be. Phi Delta Kappan.

Meier, D. (1997, January 31). For freshmen, a false start: Perils of ninth grade prompt freshmen to try new approaches. Washington Post, p. A1, A10.

Meier, Deborah (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon Press.

Meier, Deborah W. Small Schools, Big Results. The American School Board Journal.

Miller, L.S. (1995). An American imperative: Accelerating minority educational advancement. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Moffett, J. J. (1981). Options in secondary education: The school within a school concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.

Monk, D.H. (1987). Secondary school size and curriculum comprehensiveness. Economics of Education Review, 6, (2) pp. 137-150.

Morriseau, J. J. (1975). The mini-school experiment: Restructuring your school: A handbook. New York: New York Urban Coalition.

Muncey, D. E., & McQuillan, P. J. (1991). School-within-a-school restructuring and faculty divisiveness: Examples from a study of the Coalition of Essential Schools. Working Paper #6. Providence, RI: School Ethnography Project, Brown University.

Nachtigal, P. (1992). School and district size, cost, and quality. In Source book on school and district size, cost and quality. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.

National Center for Education Statistics. (1983). Digest of educational statistics, 1983-84. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Newmann, F. (1995, April). Reinventing the high school: The coalition campus school project in New York City (Comments as discussant). Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Office of Instructional Services, Dept. of Academic and Vocational Instructional Support (1993, March 3). Impact of School Size on the Educational Program. A discussion paper presented to the Facilities and Educational Support Committees of Chicago Board of Education.

Ornstein, A. (1990, Sept.). School size and effectiveness: Policy implications. Urban Review, pp. 239-45.

Ornstein, A.C. (1991). Does school size influence school effectiveness?" American Secondary Education, 20(1), 8-12.

Ornstein, A.C. (1993, April, May) School district and school size: Overview and outlook. The High School Journal, 76, pp. 240-44.

Oxley, D. (1989, Spring). Smaller is better. American Educator, pp.28-31, 51-52.

Oxley, D. (1994). Organizing schools into small units: Alternatives to homogeneous grouping. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(7), 521-526.

Oxley, D. (1994, March). Organizing Schools into Small Units: Alternatives to Homogeneous Grouping. Kappan, p. 521.

Oxley, D. (March 1994). Organizing schools into small units. Phi Delta Kappan.

Pittman, R. B. & Haughwout, P. (1987). Influence of high school size on dropout rate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, pp. 337-43.

Plath, K.R. (1965). Schools within schools: A study of high school organization. New York, NY: Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.

Polikoff, A. (1992, Fall). Why small schools work. BPI Newsletter.

Powell, A., Cohen, D., & Farrar, E. (1985). The shopping mall high school. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

Prasch, J., & Wampler, W.N. (1959, August). School within a school...A better way to organize a high school? School Management, 3, pp.33-36, 64-66.

] Public Education Association. (1992). Small schools and savings: Affordable new construction, renovation, and remodeling. New York: The Association.

Public Education Association. (1992). Small school's operating costs: Reversing assumptions about economies of scale. New York: The Association.

Public Education Association. (1992, December.) Small schools' operating costs: Reversing assumptions about economies of scale.

Ramierz, A. (1990). High school size and equality of educational opportunity. Journal of Rural and Small Schools, 4(2), 12-19.

Ramsey, R.D., Henson, O.M., & Hula, H.L. (1967). The schools-within-a-school program. West Nyack, NY: Parker.

Raywid, M. A. (1995). The subschools/small schools movement--taking stock. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 490)

Raywid, M. A. (1996). Taking stock: The movement to create mini-schools, schools-within-schools, and separate small schools. Urban Diversity Series No. 108. New York: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 396 045)

Raywid, M. A. (1996). The Wadleigh complex: A dream that soured. In W. Boyd, R. Crowson, & H. Mawhinney (Eds.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American school. Philadelphia: Falmer.

Raywid, M.A. & Henderson, H. (1994). ‘Small’ revolution in New York City. Journal of Negro Education, 63 (1).

Raywid, M.A. (1995, December). The subschools/small schools movement--taking stock. Paper commissioned by the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Raywid, M.A. (1998). Synthesis of research: Small schools: A reform that works. Educational Leadership, pp. 34-39.

Research Action Brief. (1982, February). School size: A reassessment of the small school. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

Richardson, Lynda. (1994, June 19). Being anonymous and going truant. The New York Times, pp. 1, 27.

Robinson-Lewis, H. (1991). Summative evaluation of the school-within-a-school (SWAS) program: 1988-1989, 1989-1990, 1990-1991. Kansas City: Kansas City School District.

Rutter, R. A. (1988). Effects of school as community. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 313 470)

Schoggen, P. (1984, August). Student voluntary participation in high school size. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Convention, Toronto, Canada.

Shanker, A. (1988, November). Charter schools: Option for other 80 percent. The School Administrator, p.72.

Sher, J. (Ed.) (1997). Education in rural America: A reassessment of conventional wisdom. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Sikorski, M., Wallace, T., Stariha, W., & Rankin, V. (1993, Fall). School reform and the curriculum. In Niemiec & Walberg (Eds.), Evaluating Chicago School Reform, 59. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sizer, T. (1985). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American High School. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Smaller, better schools (editorial). (1995, June 2). The New York Times, p. A28.

Spielman, F. (1995, June 8). City high schools may get smaller. The Chicago Sun-Times, p.6.

Stevens, N. G., & Peltier, G. L. (1994). A review of research on small-school student participation in extracurricular activities. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 10(2), 116-120.

Stiefel, L., Patrice I., Frutcher, N., and Berne, R. (1998, April). The effects of size of student body on school costs and performance in New York City High Schools. New York, NY: New York University, Institute for Education and Social Policy.

Swift, D. (1984). Finding and keeping teachers: Strategies for small schools. Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.

Templeton, I. (1972). School size. Educational Management Review, 13.

Toby, J. (1993, Winter). Everyday school violence: How disorder fuels it. American Educator, p. 46.

Vermont Department of Education. (1998). Report of the Small Schools Group.

Viadero, D. (1998, May 6). N.Y.C. Study weighs cost of small schools. Education Week, p. 19.

Walberg, H. J. & Walberg, H.G. III. (1994, June, July). Losing local control. Educational Researcher, 23(5), June-July 1994, pp. 19-26.

Walberg, H.J. (1993). Losing local control of education: Cost and quality implications. Heartland Policy Study, 59, p. 4.

Wang, M.C., Reynolds, M.C., and Walberg, H.J. (December 1993/January 1994). Serving students at the margin. Educational Leadership, 52(4), p. 15.

Wehlage, G., Rutter, R., Smith, G., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.

Weikart, D., & Schweinhart, L. (1993). Significant benefits: The high/scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: Educational Resource Foundation.

Weissmann, D. (1992, December). Reform heavy weights promote small schools. Catalyst: Voices of Chicago School Reform.

What can be done about the scourge of violence among juveniles? (1994, December 30). The New York Times, p.1, A10.

Wood, G. (1993). Schools that work: America's most innovative public education programs. New York: Plume.

Word, E. (1990). Student Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR).Tennessee's K-3 class size study. Final summary report, 1985-1990. Nashville: Tennessee State Department of Education. (ED 320 692).

Wynne, E. (1978). Behind the discipline problem: Youth suicide as a measure of alienation. Phi Delta Cappan, 59, 307-315.

Zais, R. (1976). Curriculum: Principles and foundations. p.396. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.